Lancet: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Reporting == * Concluded that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine did not improve the condition of COVID-19 patients, and may have harmed some. The paper was retracted because the authors refused to share any data.<ref name="covidretraction">https://archive.is/RxlBV</ref> * Dismissed concerns that COVID-19 had an unnatural origin as conspiracy theories.<ref name="origin">https://archive.is/8WEUb</ref> ==Notes== <references/>") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Reporting == | == Reporting == | ||
* Falling birth rates mean Britain must take in more immigration.<ref name="birth">https://archive.is/LSQQ5</ref> | |||
* Concluded that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine did not improve the condition of COVID-19 patients, and may have harmed some. The paper was retracted because the authors refused to share any data.<ref name="covidretraction">https://archive.is/RxlBV</ref> | * Concluded that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine did not improve the condition of COVID-19 patients, and may have harmed some. The paper was retracted because the authors refused to share any data.<ref name="covidretraction">https://archive.is/RxlBV</ref> | ||
* Dismissed concerns that COVID-19 had an unnatural origin as conspiracy theories.<ref name="origin">https://archive.is/8WEUb</ref> | * Dismissed concerns that COVID-19 had an unnatural origin as conspiracy theories.<ref name="origin">https://archive.is/8WEUb</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:24, 21 March 2024
Reporting
- Falling birth rates mean Britain must take in more immigration.[1]
- Concluded that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine did not improve the condition of COVID-19 patients, and may have harmed some. The paper was retracted because the authors refused to share any data.[2]
- Dismissed concerns that COVID-19 had an unnatural origin as conspiracy theories.[3]