Migrants Organise: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Donors == * Taxpayer grants <blockquote>Meanwhile, Migrants Organise Ltd, which promoted a protest outside the Home Office against the Rwanda policy, which it described as “kidnapping and deportation of refugees”, has received more than £10,000 in government grants. The law firm Instalaw, which went to court to challenge the legality of the Rwanda policy, received £2,000 for an apprenticeship scheme.<ref name="telegraph">https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/20...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<blockquote>Meanwhile, Migrants Organise Ltd, which promoted a protest outside the Home Office against the Rwanda policy, which it described as “kidnapping and deportation of refugees”, has received more than £10,000 in government grants. The law firm Instalaw, which went to court to challenge the legality of the Rwanda policy, received £2,000 for an apprenticeship scheme.<ref name="telegraph">https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/09/02/trans-activist-charities-receive-taxpayers-money-loophole/</ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>Meanwhile, Migrants Organise Ltd, which promoted a protest outside the Home Office against the Rwanda policy, which it described as “kidnapping and deportation of refugees”, has received more than £10,000 in government grants. The law firm Instalaw, which went to court to challenge the legality of the Rwanda policy, received £2,000 for an apprenticeship scheme.<ref name="telegraph">https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/09/02/trans-activist-charities-receive-taxpayers-money-loophole/</ref></blockquote> | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 14:10, 21 November 2023
Donors
- Taxpayer grants
Meanwhile, Migrants Organise Ltd, which promoted a protest outside the Home Office against the Rwanda policy, which it described as “kidnapping and deportation of refugees”, has received more than £10,000 in government grants. The law firm Instalaw, which went to court to challenge the legality of the Rwanda policy, received £2,000 for an apprenticeship scheme.[1]