Patrick Vallance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Described the Prime Ministers desire to remove lockdowns as "very worrying".<ref name="diary"></ref> | * Described the Prime Ministers desire to remove lockdowns as "very worrying".<ref name="diary"></ref> | ||
* Argued during the [[COVID-19]] inquiry that the lockdowns should have been "broader, harder and earlier".<ref name="lockdown2">https://archive.ph/wUTK1</ref> | * Argued during the [[COVID-19]] inquiry that the lockdowns should have been "broader, harder and earlier".<ref name="lockdown2">https://archive.ph/wUTK1</ref> | ||
* Argued in an article in [[The Times]] that [[COVID-19]] models did not only look at worst possible outcomes.<ref name="worst">https://archive.ph/646uy</ref> | * Argued in an article in [[The Times]] that [[COVID-19]] models did not only look at worst possible outcomes, even though he argued that this was what was presented to the public.<ref name="worst">https://archive.ph/646uy</ref> | ||
* Described the [[COVID-19]] MRNA vaccines as "safe and effective".<ref name="safe">https://archive.ph/3YN0e</ref> | * Described the [[COVID-19]] MRNA vaccines as "safe and effective".<ref name="safe">https://archive.ph/3YN0e</ref> | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:03, 9 July 2024
Stories
- Made science minister for Keir Starmer government.[1]
- Former Government chief scientific adviser.[2]
- Joined the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.[2]
- Climate change will kill more people than COVID-19.[3]
- We should sacrifice meat and flights for sake of climate.[4]
- Has £600,000 shareholding in firm contracted to develop vaccines.[5]
- Said it was a mistake to present the public with worst case scenario projections to justify lockdowns.[6]
- Argued to the COVID-19 inquiry that his scientific opinion was not given enough weight in comparison to the economy.[6]
- Described people who wanted to end lockdowns sooner as "Pro death squad".[7]
- Told the COVID-19 inquiry that the UK should have gone into lockdown earlier.[8]
- Calls for net zero to have immediacy of search for Covid vaccine.[9]
- Head of the government Science and Engineering.[10]
- President of R&D at GlaxoSmithKline between 2012 and 2017.[10]
- On the board of the UK Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research from 2009 to 2016.[10]
- Honorary degrees from Imperial College London, University of Glasgow and York University.[10]
- Wrote in his diary that Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies has completely rewritten the science advice.[11]
- Described the Prime Ministers desire to remove lockdowns as "very worrying".[11]
- Argued during the COVID-19 inquiry that the lockdowns should have been "broader, harder and earlier".[12]
- Argued in an article in The Times that COVID-19 models did not only look at worst possible outcomes, even though he argued that this was what was presented to the public.[13]
- Described the COVID-19 MRNA vaccines as "safe and effective".[14]
Notes
- ↑ https://archive.ph/R2Mr6
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 https://archive.is/o7W8L
- ↑ https://archive.ph/E8MzM
- ↑ https://archive.ph/r1VxM
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 https://archive.ph/pLi7D
- ↑ https://archive.ph/SBTex
- ↑ https://archive.ph/1Ab49
- ↑ https://archive.ph/tlc3D
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 https://archive.ph/gzxb5
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 https://archive.ph/SBTex
- ↑ https://archive.ph/wUTK1
- ↑ https://archive.ph/646uy
- ↑ https://archive.ph/3YN0e